| Submission |
| Editorial Board |
| Reviewers |
| Author Guidelines |
| Reviewers Guidelines |
| Peer Review Process |
| Ethics & Malpractice Statement |
| AI Usage Policy |
| Secreening Plagiarism |
| Copyright Notice |
| Article Processing Charge |
| Indexing & Abstracting |
| Article Template [English] |
| Artikel Templat [Indonesia] |
| Recommend Tools |
Ethics & Malpractice Statement
Digi-Meta is committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics, following guidelines established by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
Duties of Authors
- Manuscripts must represent original work; plagiarism in any form is unacceptable
- Authors must disclose all funding sources and conflicts of interest
- Data fabrication or falsification will result in immediate rejection and, if discovered post-publication, retraction
- All listed authors must have made substantial contributions to the work
Duties of Reviewers
- Reviewers must evaluate manuscripts objectively and maintain confidentiality
- Reviewers must disclose any conflicts of interest and decline review if present
- Reviewers must alert editors to any suspected plagiarism or ethical concerns
Duties of Editors
- Editors are solely responsible for deciding which manuscripts are published, based on academic merit alone
- Editors must maintain confidentiality of submitted work
- Editors must ensure a fair, unbiased peer review process free of conflicts of interest
Handling of Misconduct
- Allegations of misconduct (plagiarism, data fabrication, duplicate submission) will be investigated following COPE flowcharts. Confirmed violations may result in rejection, retraction, and notification to the author's institution.